How the criteria are applied
Markets and product fit. We open the sport a reader is most likely to use and count the market types, the alternate lines and the live options. A long list of sports with shallow markets scores lower than a shorter list with real depth.
Rules and settlement. We look for the scenarios that decide real tickets: an abandoned match, a retired player, a dead heat, a scoring correction, a tied parlay leg and an unavailable cash-out. Rules that exist but cannot be found are treated as missing.
Payments and support. Deposits and withdrawals are assessed separately. We look for verification timing, processing windows, currency handling, fees and a documented complaint route — the practical path a reader actually walks.
Responsible betting. We check whether limits, breaks and self-exclusion are reachable inside the product rather than buried in a policy page, and whether the marketing language pushes urgency.
The freshness check
Every criterion is re-read against the date. Archived odds, expired bonuses and historical event pages are context, never current evidence. Where a figure could have changed, the page says so and points to the source instead of repeating the figure.
What a score is not
A score is not a chance of winning, a guarantee of payout, a safety certification, or a statement that a service is legal where you live. It is an editorial comparison of clarity and market fit, applied consistently across the directory.